Very interesting diary on DailyKos by bonddad attempting to explain what the impact of the recession has been on jobs.
Now, as clearly as I understand it, the US economy needs to grow at the rate of 250,000 jobs a month to keep pace with population growth--and I think, I think!, this this would translate to 0.0% growth in GDP per capita. The addition of 250,000 jobs would make the pie bigger, but you'd have to cut it in more pieces. Its fuzzy, but basically just think of 250,000 new jobs per month as a 0.0% increase in standard of living.
This means that looking at the creation or deletion of jobs needs to take into account the historical nature of a growing economy, as, say, the lost of 10,000 of 1,000,000 jobs is not on the same scale of 10,000 of 100,000, even though those 10,000 are SOL and deserve your sympathy. More later on this.
I've noticed lefties try to use raw data, and indeed the graph in a previous post from the speaker, when percentages are key to understanding the economic impact on job losses. Which is not the whole story, obviously, and in reality looking at one is like looking at the reflection of the other. But I think its perfectly acceptable to use raw data to show the amount of current pain.
Showing posts with label job losses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label job losses. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Friday, February 6, 2009
This...
...is why I'm so pissed off about this stupid damned stimulus.
And it's why I've been drawing all my little charts, and writing all the long posts, and explaining why infrastructure is important as it relates to economic growth...why the stimulus should revolve around infrastructure...
But none of that really fucking matters when you have retarded dildos running things.
To Sen Collins and Sen Nelson: I hope this chart counts you as quickly as possible. You fail at America.

Introductory macroeconomics helps stop this. Fuck! Woooouuullllddd you like to know whyyyy our little friend the green line is so steep? Because there's nothing but stimulus to stop it from bottoming out. The blue line and the red line had a little thing I like to call "monetary policy" to keep the recession from being so bad. Didn't have to go into debt, just had to pull the monetary policy lever and cut interest rates and things would pick up. But wouldn't you know it, we're already at 0.25%, so that shit don't work no' mo.'
So, call it what you will, a "market correction," what have you. The point is, life is going to suck for a very long time.
And it's why I've been drawing all my little charts, and writing all the long posts, and explaining why infrastructure is important as it relates to economic growth...why the stimulus should revolve around infrastructure...
But none of that really fucking matters when you have retarded dildos running things.
To Sen Collins and Sen Nelson: I hope this chart counts you as quickly as possible. You fail at America.

Introductory macroeconomics helps stop this. Fuck! Woooouuullllddd you like to know whyyyy our little friend the green line is so steep? Because there's nothing but stimulus to stop it from bottoming out. The blue line and the red line had a little thing I like to call "monetary policy" to keep the recession from being so bad. Didn't have to go into debt, just had to pull the monetary policy lever and cut interest rates and things would pick up. But wouldn't you know it, we're already at 0.25%, so that shit don't work no' mo.'
So, call it what you will, a "market correction," what have you. The point is, life is going to suck for a very long time.
Labels:
job losses,
stimulus,
unemployment
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)